Elsevier

Biotechnology Advances

Volume 36, Issue 4, July–August 2018, Pages 1255-1273
Biotechnology Advances

Research review paper
Microalgae as multi-functional options in modern agriculture: current trends, prospects and challenges

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.04.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Algae are a group of ubiquitous photosynthetic organisms comprising eukaryotic green algae and Gram-negative prokaryotic cyanobacteria, which have immense potential as a bioresource for various industries related to biofuels, pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals and feed. This fascinating group of organisms also has applications in modern agriculture through facilitating increased nutrient availability, maintaining the organic carbon and fertility of soil, and enhancing plant growth and crop yields, as a result of stimulation of soil microbial activity. Several cyanobacteria provide nitrogen fertilization through biological nitrogen fixation and through enzymatic activities related to interconversions and mobilization of different forms of nitrogen. Both green algae and cyanobacteria are involved in the production of metabolites such as growth hormones, polysaccharides, antimicrobial compounds, etc., which play an important role in the colonization of plants and proliferation of microbial and eukaryotic communities in soil. Currently, the development of consortia of cyanobacteria with bacteria or fungi or microalgae or their biofilms has widened their scope of utilization. Development of integrated wastewater treatment and biomass production systems is an emerging technology, which exploits the nutrient sequestering potential of microalgae and its valorisation. This review focuses on prospects and challenges of application of microalgae in various areas of agriculture, including crop production, protection and natural resource management. An overview of the recent advances, novel technologies developed, their commercialization status and future directions are also included.

Introduction

Biofertilizers are gaining significance in sustainable agriculture as a means of enhancing crop productivity, in an environmentally friendly and economically viable manner, and reducing the polluting effects of synthetic fertilizers (Singh et al., 2011a, Singh et al., 2011b). Among the various types of biofertilizers, formulations based on photosynthetic organisms, including eukaryotic microalgae, anoxygenic phototrophs and cyanobacteria, are gaining importance because of their significant contributions, particularly to the maintenance of soil fertility and enhancing crop yields (Li et al., 2017; Thilagar et al., 2016).

Algae constitute a broad group of photosynthetic organisms, including eukaryotic microalgae and prokaryotic cyanobacteria, besides macro-forms such as seaweeds and other marine forms (Lee, 2008). The morphological characteristics of eukaryotic microalgae and prokaryotic cyanobacteria resemble a thallus, i.e. not differentiated into root or shoots, and comprise unicellular, multicellular, aggregates, colonial to filamentous unbranched and branched forms. The filamentous cyanobacteria may be further divided into heterocystous (inclusive of specialized cells for N fixation) and non-heterocystous forms. Most of the algae, both micro- and macro- forms play an important role in environmental carbon sequestration and are responsible for 50% of the total photosynthesis on the earth (Moroney and Ynalvez, 2009). The involvement of cyanobacteria and eukaryotic green microalgae in the mineralization, mobilization of organic and inorganic, major and micronutrients, production of bioactive compounds, (polysaccharides, growth hormones, antimicrobial compounds, etc.) can improve the plant growth and thus makes them suitable as biofertilizing options (Gantar and Elhai, 1999; Gayathri et al., 2015; Hernández-Carlos and Gamboa-Angulo, 2011; Jäger et al., 2010; Nilsson et al., 2002; Stirk et al., 2013; Prasanna et al., 2016a; Venkataraman, 1972). They have a key role in maintaining the productivity of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems through photosynthesis and N fixation, and improving the availability of nutrients through cycling and transformations (Moroney and Ynalvez, 2009). Application of N (nitrogen)-fixing cyanobacteria, termed as “Algalization” not only enhances the N status of soil and plant, but also minimizes the use of chemical N fertilizer (Venkataraman, 1972, Venkataraman, 1981; Etesami and Alikhani, 2016; Prasanna et al., 2016b; Swarnalakshmi et al., 2013). Being all-pervasive in nature and pioneers in inhospitable habitats, including metal contaminated lands, salt affected sites, wastelands etc., microalgae can survive and proliferate and even dominate such niches (Apte and Thomas, 1997; Chaillan et al., 2006; Pandey et al., 2005). They may also facilitate the reclamation of such inhospitable habitats (Apte and Thomas, 1997; Pandey et al., 2005).

Microalgae, particularly cyanobacteria are also considered as potential biocontrol agents as they exhibit antagonistic effect against many plant pathogens such as bacteria, fungi and nematodes, mainly as a result of production of hydrolytic enzymes and biocidal compounds such as benzoic acid, majusculonic acid, etc. (Chandel, 2009; Chaudhary et al., 2012; Prasanna et al., 2008b; Gupta et al., 2013). These antimicrobial compounds can suppress pathogenic microbes through the disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane, and inhibition of protein synthesis etc. (Swain et al., 2017). The ability of cyanobacteria in persisting in plant rhizosphere and colonize plant parts is an indirect mechanism supplementing the antagonistic effects on the plant pathogens and pests through the production and release of hydrolytic enzymes, antimicrobial metabolites, thus elicit the activity of plant defense enzymes. Electron microscopic analyses and soil/plant DNA fingerprints have helped to validate their establishment in the plant rhizosphere and colonization of roots and shoot regions (Karthikeyan et al., 2009; Babu et al., 2015a, Babu et al., 2015b; Bidyarani et al., 2015; Nilsson et al., 2002). The inoculation of these organisms influences various metabolic processes in plants as they elicit the activity of plant defense enzymes, thereby transporters, chelating agents etc. that lead to enhanced plant immunity to pathogens, and increase in plant growth and crop yields (Gupta et al., 2013).

The deployment of cyanobacteria in agriculture has been well documented in terms of their potential in enhancing plant growth, crop yields, modulation of soil microbial activity and nutrient characteristics (Table 1). In addition, recent studies have also revealed the potential use of green microalgae as biofertilizer, for enhanced soil fertility, plant growth, fruit quality and nutritional characteristics and grain yield (Coppens et al., 2016). Extensive research on the use of cyanobacteria as biofertilizer and soil conditioner has proved the potential of these organisms in sustainable agriculture (Venkataraman, 1972, Venkataraman, 1981; Gupta et al., 2013; Wuang et al., 2016; Garcia-Gonzalez and Sommerfeld, 2016). Most of the previous research focused on the N fertilization through the diazotrophic cyanobacteria (Kaushik, 1998) and other beneficial aspects were less explored (Mandal et al., 1999). However, recent studies showed that the inoculation of cyanobacteria could also increase the availability of other micro- (Zinc (Zn), Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe), etc.) and macronutrients (carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K)) in soil and their translocation inside plants, upto grains (Coppens et al., 2016; Nisha et al., 2007; Rana et al., 2012). Formerly, the use of cyanobacteria, particularly heterocystous (N fixing) strains as biofertilizer was restricted to rice crop. However, research in last two decades showed possibilities of their wide use as biofertilizer beyond rice, where both heterocystous and non-heterocystous forms and their consortia with agriculturally beneficial green algae, bacteria, fungi, have shown promise. Cyanobacterial inoculation in the soil, as seed dressings or broadcasting in fields or dipping in biofertilizer slurry and/or seed priming are reported to increase seed germination rate, plant growth and yield in variety of cereal, horticultural and vegetable crops (Karthikeyan et al., 2007; Prasanna et al., 2013a, Prasanna et al., 2015a, Prasanna et al., 2015b; Prasanna et al., 2016a; Prasanna et al., 2016b, Prasanna et al., 2017).

The present review highlights the prospects of cyanobacteria and green algae as options for biofertilization, bioremediation, and as agents for improving soil structure and functioning, and enhancing plant growth and yields. Recent developments and environmental benefits of these organisms and future interventions required to meet the demands of modern agriculture are also discussed.

Section snippets

Microalgae as biofertilizers, plant growth promoters and soil fertility enhancing options

In nature, algae are cosmopolitan, and exist even in hot and cold deserts, soil crusts, in rock crevices, or in ocean depths. In these habitats, microalgae predominantly comprise unicellular, colonial forms, besides being associated with fungi as lichens, and contribute significantly towards carbon sequestration in such habitats. Algae also show positive impacts on soil quality for sustainable agriculture. Algae increase the soil fertility by increasing the overall soil microbial activity and

Pest and disease management using microalgae

The use of chemical biocides against pathogen and pest control in agricultural practices is hazardous to the sustainability of agroecosystems. This has led to an urge in the exploration of alternative sustainable approaches for pathogen control. The use of biological options represents effective and environmentally friendly strategies for the control of soil borne pathogens (Spadaro and Gullino, 2005). The most commonly identified organisms for biocontrol include some bacteria and fungi (

Improving soil structure

Soil erosion, or the exclusion of top most fertile soil due to physical forces such as water, wind, and farming activities affects the fertility and productivity of agricultural soil. Many green algae and cyanobacterial species are reported to produce and excrete EPS in the surrounding environment (Weiss et al., 2012; Xiao and Zheng, 2016). Besides having a role in contribution to soil organic carbon, EPS facilitate the prevention of soil erosion and maintenance of appropriate soil structure (

Modes of deployment of microalgae

Significant advances have been made in the use of algal biofertilizers in the last three decades. The use of cyanobacteria and green algae based consortia, bioflocs and biofilms are emerging as latest trends to increase the establishment and effectiveness of algae biofertilizers; it may be interesting and crucial to study the compatibility and ability of different partners to grow together, for their successful deployment.

Biotechnological advances in the use of algae biofertilizers

Algal biotechnology has significantly developed in last decade; sequencing of whole genome of several algae has been completed and some are still in the pipeline. Genetic modifications of algae have been undertaken, in the context of their wide ranging applications, particularly for their use as biofuels and biofertilizers. Cyanobacteria such as Nostoc and Anabaena strains are the common model organisms for use as biofertilizers, due to their capability of fixing atmospheric N and preponderance

Biorefinery approach

As the cultivation of algal fertilizers requires large amount of water and fertilizers, this often questions their environmental and economic feasibility. Therefore, integration of biofertilizer production with non-potable water sources, cheap source of nutrients, or increasing the value chain and by products from the production technologies seem to be viable trends for the future. Fig. 3 depicts the integrated biorefinery approach of microalgae for its various applications.

Commercial aspects of microalgae in agriculture

The colossal amount of nutrients is required to serve the commercial agriculture needs. To supply these nutrients in the form of microalgal biofertilizer will require huge amount of microalgal biomass. In chemical fertilizers, anhydrous ammonia contains 82% N; while microalgal biomass comprises of 1%‑10% nitrogen (N) (Cabanelas et al., 2013). Therefore, it may be assumed that approximately 15 times more microalgae material will be required to attain similar level of fertilization. According to

Conclusions

Recent developments on the utilization of consortia/biofilms of green algae and cyanobacteria with different agriculturally beneficial microbes as biofertilizer have proved promising potential. Algal biofertilizers offer additional benefits such as biocontrol of plant pathogens, reduced use of chemicals and minimized greenhouse gas emissions, besides their use as nutrient supplements. However, the success of algal fertilizers is highly dependent on the economics of their biomass production.

Acknowledgements

Author, Nirmal Renuka is thankful to NRF-SARChI (South Africa) for postdoctoral fellowship. Authors hereby acknowledge the Durban University of Technology South Africa, National Research Foundation (South Africa) (NRF SARChI UID 84166), for financial contribution.

References (233)

  • L.E. de-Bashan et al.

    Chlorellasorokiniana UTEX 2805, a heat and intense, sunlight-tolerant microalga with potential for removing ammonium from wastewater

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2008)
  • A. Bhatnagar et al.

    Renewable biomass production by mixotrophic algae in the presence of various carbon sources and wastewaters

    Appl. Energy

    (2011)
  • N. Bidyarani et al.

    Enhancement of plant growth and yields in Chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) through novel cyanobacterial and biofilmed inoculants

    Microbiol. Res.

    (2016)
  • I.T.D. Cabanelas et al.

    Comparing the use of different domestic wastewaters for coupling microalgal production and nutrient removal

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • F. Chaillan et al.

    Role of cyanobacteria in the biodegradation of crude oil by a tropical cyanobacterial mat

    Chemosphere

    (2006)
  • S. Chinnasamy et al.

    Microalgae cultivation in a wastewater dominated by carpet mill effluents for biofuel applications

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • S. Corbel et al.

    Cyanobacterial toxins: modes of actions, fate in aquatic and soil ecosystems, phytotoxicity and bioaccumulation in agricultural crops

    Chemosphere

    (2014)
  • J.G. Day et al.

    Microzooplanktonic grazers – A potentially devastating threat to the commercial success of microalgal mass culture

    Algal Res.

    (2017)
  • J.I. Drever et al.

    The role of organic acids in mineral weathering

    Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.

    (1997)
  • A.S. Dukare et al.

    Evaluating novel microbe amended composts as biocontrol agents in tomato

    Crop Prot.

    (2011)
  • C. Durall et al.

    Mechanisms of carbon fixation and engineering for increased carbon fixation in cyanobacteria

    Algal Res.

    (2015)
  • E.A. Ehimen et al.

    Anaerobic digestion of microalgae residues resulting from the biodiesel production process

    Appl. Energy

    (2011)
  • I.V. Elanskaya et al.

    Resistance to nitrophenolic herbicides and metronidazole in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as a result of the inactivation of a nitroreductase-like protein encoded by drgA gene

    FEBS Lett.

    (1998)
  • M.M. El-Sheekh et al.

    Production and characterization of antimicrobial active substance from the cyanobacterium Nostocmuscorum

    Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2006)
  • J.B. Epp et al.

    The discovery of Arylex active and Rinskor active: two novel auxin herbicides

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2016)
  • H. Etesami et al.

    Co-inoculation with endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria allows reduced application rates of N-fertilizer for rice plant

    Rhizosphere

    (2016)
  • M. Gayathri et al.

    In vitro regeneration of Arachis hypogaea L. and Moringa oleifera Lam. using extracellular phytohormones from Aphanothece sp. MBDU 515

    Algal Res.

    (2015)
  • A. Ghosh et al.

    Carbon concentration in algae: reducing CO2 From exhaust gas

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2017)
  • A. Guldhe et al.

    Heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae using aquaculture wastewater: a biorefinery concept for biomass production and nutrient remediation

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2017)
  • V. Gupta et al.

    New insights into the biodiversity and applications of cyanobacteria (blue-green algae)—Prospects and challenges

    Algal Res.

    (2013)
  • S.M. Hamed et al.

    Sensitivity of two green microalgae to copper stress: growth, oxidative and antioxidants analyses

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (2017)
  • D. Hernández et al.

    Treatment of agro-industrial wastewater using microalgae–bacteria consortium combined with anaerobic digestion of the produced biomass

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • P. Holajjer et al.

    Potential of cyanobacteria for biorational management of plant parasitic nematodes: a review

    Crop Prot.

    (2013)
  • S. Hongyang et al.

    Cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa in soybean processing wastewater

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • A.A. Issa

    Antibiotic production by the cyanobacteria Oscillatoriaangustissima and Calothrixparietina

    Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (1999)
  • K. Jäger et al.

    Improvement of maize (Zeamays L.) anther culture responses by algae-derived natural substances

    S. Afr. J. Bot.

    (2010)
  • N. Karthikeyan et al.

    Evaluating the potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria as inoculants for wheat

    Eur. J. Soil Biol.

    (2007)
  • Z. Khan et al.

    Effects of inoculum level and time of Microcoleus vaginatus on control of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato

    J. Asia Pac. Entomol.

    (1999)
  • Z. Khan et al.

    Management of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato by root-dip treatment in culture filtrate of the blue-green alga, Microcoleusvaginatus

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2005)
  • Z. Khan et al.

    Observations on the suppression of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne arenaria) on tomato by incorporation of cyanobacterial powder (Oscillatoria chlorina) into potting field soil

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2007)
  • H. Kheirfam et al.

    Controlling rainfall-induced soil loss from small experimental plots through inoculation of bacteria and cyanobacteria

    Catena

    (2017)
  • E. Koutra et al.

    Microalgal post-treatment of anaerobically digested agro-industrial wastes for nutrient removal and lipids production

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • S. Kreitlow et al.

    Cyanobacteria-a potential source of new biologically active substances

    J. Biotechnol.

    (1999)
  • M. Krings et al.

    Endophytic cyanobacteria in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: a scenario for the origin of a symbiosis?

    Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.

    (2009)
  • M. Kumar et al.

    Evaluating the plant growth promoting ability of thermotolerant bacteria and cyanobacteria and their interactions with seed spice crops

    Sci. Hortic.

    (2013)
  • M.H. Abd-Alla et al.

    Suitability of some local agro-industrial wastes as carrier materials for cyanobacterial inoculant

    Folia Microbiol.

    (1994)
  • S.I.I. Abdel-Hafez et al.

    Fungicidal activity of extracellular products of cyanobacteria against Alternariaporri

    Eur. J. Phycol.

    (2015)
  • A. Adak et al.

    Micronutrient enrichment mediated by plant-microbe interactions and rice cultivation practices

    J. Plant Nutr.

    (2016)
  • E. Ahmed et al.

    Siderophores in environmental research: roles and applications

    Microb. Biotechnol.

    (2014)
  • O.M. Aliyu et al.

    Foliar application of the exogenous plant hormones at pre-blooming stage improves flowering and fruiting in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.)

    J. Crop. Sci. Biotechnol.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (267)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text